YDLib
← All articles & findingsPUBLIC · NO ACCOUNT REQUIRED

Starter article · illustrative research, not empirical findings

YDLib / Market structure / Article

Does the opening range contain useful information?

A testable hypothesis, a precise event definition and a plan for finding out—without confusing a probability with a trading strategy.

Starter content · illustrative only. This is an example of how YDLib presents research. It contains no empirical results or validated trading edge.

The question

Does a breakout of a predefined opening range reach a one-range target before the opposite barrier or session cutoff? This is an untested hypothesis, not a claim that opening-range breakouts are profitable.

Start with one instrument and session. Write the timezone, daylight-saving convention, data frequency and sample dates explicitly.

Define the event before testing

Choose a range window, such as the first 30 minutes after a specified session open. Let its high be HH, low be LL, and width be w=H−Lw=H-L. Define a breakout using an executable rule: first touch, first close beyond a boundary, or a stop order with an explicit fill model.

For an illustrative long entry at HH, a stop at LL risks ww. A 1:1 target is therefore H+wH+w. A stop at the midpoint risks w/2w/2 and needs a different 1:1 target. These definitions must not be mixed.

State the short-side equivalent, cutoff, and whether a second attempt is allowed.

Measure three outcomes

Classify eligible observations as target first, stop first, or neither by cutoff. Report the total eligible sample and all three counts. If both barriers are touched in one bar, use finer data or label the observation ambiguous; do not assume the favorable order.

p^target=Ntarget firstNeligible\widehat p_{target}=\frac{N_{target\ first}}{N_{eligible}}

Keep a confidence interval with the estimate. A conditional estimate that excludes neither outcomes answers a different question and must be labelled separately.

Turn a signal into a strategy

A signal describes an event probability. A strategy adds executable entry, exit, sizing and risk rules. Include spread, commission, slippage and the actual return of cutoff exits.

E^[R]=1n∑i=1nRi\widehat{\mathbb E}[R]=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}R_i

For the restrictive two-outcome, equal-size payoff case before costs, E[R]=p−(1−p)=2p−1\mathbb E[R]=p-(1-p)=2p-1. Real cutoff exits, variable fills and costs generally invalidate that shortcut.

A validation plan

  1. Reserve a chronological holdout before selecting filters.
  2. Compare the baseline and a small preregistered set of filters on the same dates.
  3. Record every tested variant, including failures.
  4. Inspect rolling behavior, sample size and sensitivity to costs.
  5. Evaluate the final unchanged rules on the holdout.
  6. Forward test execution on a demo account before making any deployment decision.

Status: proposed research only. No test has been run for this article.